Am Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:28:16 -0400 Michael Butler <imb_at_protected-networks.net> schrieb: > -current is not great for interactive use at all. The strategy of > pre-emptively dropping idle processes to swap is hurting .. big time. What is the gain then? If this "feature" results in corrupted ssh sessions, slow console sessions or even worse: prolongued compilation times, then it is a big fail! > > Compare inactive memory to swap in this example .. > > 110 processes: 1 running, 108 sleeping, 1 zombie > CPU: 1.2% user, 0.0% nice, 4.3% system, 0.0% interrupt, 94.5% idle > Mem: 474M Active, 1609M Inact, 764M Wired, 281M Buf, 119M Free > Swap: 4096M Total, 917M Used, 3178M Free, 22% Inuse > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU > COMMAND > 1819 imb 1 28 0 213M 11284K select 1 147:44 5.97% > gkrellm > 59238 imb 43 20 0 980M 424M select 0 10:07 1.92% > firefox > > .. it shouldn't start randomly swapping out processes because they're > used infrequently when there's more than enough RAM to spare .. > > It also shows up when trying to reboot .. on all of my gear, 90 seconds > of "fail-safe" time-out is no longer enough when a good proportion of > daemons have been dropped onto swap and must be brought back in to flush > their data segments :-( > > Michael
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:03 UTC