Re: NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS and PkgBase

From: Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) <"Ngie>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 00:35:10 -0700
(Replying because I kicked the hornet’s nest when my build failed)
Hi Ben,

> On May 7, 2016, at 00:27, Ben Woods <woodsb02_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, 7 May 2016, Glen Barber <gjb_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
>> With 'installkernel', the first kernel listed in KERNCONF is installed
>> as the default (/boot/kernel), and subsequent kernels are installed with
>> the kernel name included in the path (/boot/kernel.${INSTKERNNAME}).  In
>> both cases (source-based upgrades and with pkgbase), the behavior will
>> remain the same.
>> 
>> Glen
>> 
> 
> Hi Glen,
> 
> With the recent commit mentioned previously, only the first kernel listed
> in KERNCONF is installed unless make.conf contains the following line:
> NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS=no
> 
> This affects both source-based upgrades (make installkernel) and package
> building (make packages).
> 
> Is this the desired behaviour?

The naming is very confusing. It should be:

- MK_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS=no -> only install one
- MK_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS=yes -> install multiple, as gjb_at_ described above.

Since I kicked the hornet’s nest (and imp_at_ complained about the NO_*), I’ll introduce a new WITH/WITHOUT option for this and release/release.sh can use it.

Thanks!
-Ngie
Received on Sat May 07 2016 - 05:35:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:04 UTC