On Friday, May 27, 2016 09:17:01 PM Mateusz Guzik wrote: > Hello there, > > quite some time ago I posted a trivial patch to locking primitives. What > they do is the inline part tries an atomic op and if that fails the > actual function is called, which immediately tries the same op. > > The obvious optimisation checks for the availability of the lock first. > > There concerns about the way it was done previously by relying on > volatile behaving in a specific way. > > Later a simplified version was posted which should not have the concern, > but the thread died. > > I refer you to https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2015-November/058100.html > for simple benchmark results. > > I would like to get the patch in before 11 freeze. I think this looks fine. Thanks for expanding the previous patch to cover more primitives. -- John BaldwinReceived on Fri May 27 2016 - 21:21:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:05 UTC