+10 on option 2. Hate to say it, but I'd rather this little corner of freebsd be "right" before it gets more heavily used. -a On 10 November 2016 at 03:21, Andriy Gapon <avg_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > On 14/10/2016 18:51, Lewis Donzis wrote: >> Our opinion doesn’t count for much, but I like 2 or 4. Option 1 would >> essentially obviate the entire purpose of changing the structure. Option 2 >> basically finishes the job and makes it work properly. Option 3 is, as you >> say, unappealing. I have no problem with Option 4, obviously we can change >> our code back to the old way, but assuming there was a good reason for this >> change in the first place, Option 2 seems more logical. >> >> But whatever y’all decide is fine with us, we’ll just change code to match at >> the appropriate time. > > Anyone interested in the issue, could you please take a look at this review? > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8430 > > Thank you. > > -- > Andriy Gapon > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arch_at_freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Thu Nov 10 2016 - 15:05:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:08 UTC