On 14/10/2016 18:11, Michael Gmelin wrote: > For some history on these changes, please see also [1] and [2] (there > were a few discussions and the revision was bumped, I also tried to > get some attention, but not enough it seems). > > Given your recent changes to iicbus in HEAD, I think it would be best to > MFC those and go with Option 4 or, if that's to drastic, go with > Option 1. I am leaning towards this approach as well. > Thanks for cleaning after me. You asked for a discussion and reviews. I can not recall what I was doing at that time, but I completely ignored the development and for that I can only blame myself. > [1]https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2015-March/016972.html > [2]https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2015-May/017157.html I also agree that having a thin library on top of the ioctl would be a convenience. -- Andriy GaponReceived on Fri Oct 14 2016 - 13:31:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:08 UTC