Re: 11.0-RELEASE status update

On Thursday, September 01, 2016 02:22:04 PM Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 9/1/2016 2:13 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:10:00PM +0000, Glen Barber wrote:
> > 
> >> As some of you may be aware, a few last-minute showstoppers appeared
> >> since 11.0-RC1 (and before RC1).
> >>
> >> One of the showstoppers has been fixed in 12-CURRENT, and merged to
> >> stable/11 and releng/11.0 that affected booting from large volumes:
> >>
> >>  https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212139
> >>
> >> There is one issue that is still being investigated, which we are
> >> classifying as an EN candidate, given the manifestations of the issue
> >> and reproducibility:
> >>
> >>  https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212168
> >>
> >> There is one blocker before 11.0-RELEASE, that affects libarchive, which
> >> we are waiting for feedback.  Once feedback is received, the schedule
> >> for 11.0-RELEASE will be updated on the website to reflect reality.
> >>
> >> There are a few post-release EN items on our watch list as well, so if
> >> something was not mentioned here, that does not mean it will not be
> >> fixed in 11.0-RELEASE.
> >>
> >> Apologies for the delay, and as always, thank you for your patience.
> >>
> >> Glen
> >> On behalf of:	re_at_
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > Do you planed to fix issuse with missied and delete libmap32.conf?
> > 
> 
> This was done intentionally quite a while ago:
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=282421
> 
> Though it was later removed from ObsoleteFiles so 'make delete-old'
> would not remove it from users' systems in r282423.
> 
> etcupdate removing it is the problem really being reported here.

Mmm, etcupdate should not remove a modified file.  However, etcupdate
assumes that a file removed from /etc is supposed to be removed.  If
your libmap32.conf is unmodified then it truly is pointless since
/usr/lib32/private doesn't exist anymore in 11.

-- 
John Baldwin