Re: IPFW on CURRENT: NAT forwarding exposes internal IP!

It looks like your httpd server is doing a redirect to your internal IP address, which it thinks is it’s ServerName. Don’t think NAT has anything to do with it.

Daniel

> On 29.09.2016 г., at 15:47, O. Hartmann <ohartman_at_zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> 
> Despite other problems with IPFW and its documentation regarding NAT, I face a serious
> and disturbing problem.
> 
> I run a NanoBSD based router/firewall project of my own, running CURRENT (FreeBSD
> 12.0-CURRENT #1 r306333: Mon Sep 26 08:36:02 CEST 2016). IPFW is the filter of my choice,
> since it is FreeBSD's native. I also use In-kernel-NAT as well as pppoed/ppp. The modem
> is connected to a dedicated NIC, the pppoe-traffic is transported via tun0 - I think this
> is the usual stuff.
> 
> The IPFW has this NAT rule:
> 
> ${fwcmd}        nat 1 config if ${if_isp0} \
>                        log \
>                        reset \
>                        same_ports \
>                        redirect_port tcp ${server_gate}:22 22 \
>                        redirect_port tcp ${server_www}:80 80 \
>                        redirect_port tcp ${server_www}:443 443 \
>                        redirect_port tcp ${server_refdb}:9734 9734
> 
> server_www is assigned to a non-official IP, 192.168.10.10.
> 
> if_isp=tun0, tun0's IP is given by the provider, I use net/ddclient as the updater for a
> dynamic DNS account.
> 
> I use an internal DNS server, which resolves 92.168.10.10 to a certain name. I also use
> self signed SSL certicates, just for completeness of this information.
> 
> Connecting from the outside world to my dynDNS domain triggers Firefox or any other
> browser to compalin about the self signed SSL certificate - as usual, but then, adding
> it, suddenly the domain name (say: www.blabla.org) is replaced by the internal IP I
> delegate any access on ports 80 and 443 to.
> 
> What happens here? I consider this a bug, I never saw this on our Linux servers running a
> similar setup (forwarding, BIND 9.10/BIND 9.11).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Oliver
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
> 
> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX7Q17AAoJEOgBcD7A/5N88yAH/RZLURQbC5LTgJD/NUdE51F3
> yPVaUQIaeGm93du87K2opXs3DNtMr0m1SI1wQZdOAQDl3yqMkz9bX9VTUweuAltp
> ZcBxhZ2VACQJCu/AsYIWWWp6rliniyZWMr+TOyNtTDxdPrIXYzwefX+fYN+Uy/04
> 9PalfcT/S+9q5DKd7sm7K6LqsU0HJ9GpKgNnsyqWEAWvORgxUvKS3GS9jEjxUnrD
> 20yTXjyiu0mS8UYLS7DbrrgItg3fXEJVG8188tweFB5aalQRH6oyNGaxWlGaF8Rc
> K9t479v6OW3XCs9FiG6AtCzpmnUkCoMtxl7lY3hPU/Sh1P5epYu26bdoF2ecr1g=
> =oMGL
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"