On Wednesday 05 April 2017 19:44:51 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:15:41PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > I've also tried without WITH_DEBUG= and now. . . > > > > > > # pkg delete llvm40 > > > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > > > Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0 > > > packages in the universe): > > > > > > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > > > llvm40-4.0.0 > > > > > > Number of packages to be removed: 1 > > > > > > The operation will free 1 GiB. > > > > That 1G looks like a big jump from 259M of llvm39-3.9.1_1.txz to me. > > I'm surely looking forward modularization of LLVM port; rebuilding it > > every time becomes a real PITA given that X11 stack requires it. :-( > > What real reason of requiring llvm for X11? > I am about run time depends: > > # pkg info -r llvm39 > llvm39-3.9.1_4: > libEGL-13.0.6 > dri-13.0.6,2 > > # ldd /usr/local/lib/libXvMCr600.so > /usr/local/lib/libXvMCr600.so: > [...] > libLLVM-3.9.so => /usr/local/llvm39/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so (0x803e00000) > libLTO.so => /usr/local/llvm39/lib/../lib/libLTO.so (0x808200000) [...] > > # ls -lh /usr/local/llvm39/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so > /usr/local/llvm39/lib/../lib/libLTO.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 38M Apr > 2 18:18 /usr/local/llvm39/lib/../lib/libLTO.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel > 47M Apr 2 18:18 /usr/local/llvm39/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so > > libXvMCr600 realy do run-time llvm interpetation and linker-time > optimisation?! > > Also, I am don't see any realy dependence libEGL-13.0.6 from llvm. Yes, Mesa really uses LLVM at runtime for shader compilation/optimization, and Xorg depends on Mesa for GLX, etc.Received on Wed Apr 05 2017 - 15:12:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:11 UTC