It'll be supported as much as someone is willing to pay for it. It isn't out of the realm of possibility to implement an if_transmit style layer for altq, etc so it could be a generic queue discipline. It'd be nice to have a multi-queue version of this but we're not there yet. Thanks, -adrian On 25 April 2017 at 07:43, Nick Rogers <ncrogers_at_gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Eugene M. Zheganin <emz_at_norma.perm.ru> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> regarding all this stir around ALTQ and igb(4), and mentioning that igb(4) >> doesn't have ALTQ in HEAD - I wanted to ask - is this just igb(4) and >> ixgbe(4) that lost ALTQ in HEAD, or is ALTQ being removed totally from >> FreeBSD ? I did a couple of searches, but seems like I cannot find the >> simple answer. > > I'm also curious what the plan is w.r.t ALTQ. I definitely depend on > igb supporting it... Thanks. > >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> Eugene. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net_at_freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net_at_freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Wed Apr 26 2017 - 19:14:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:11 UTC