Re: SIGSEGV in /bin/sh after r322740 -> r322776 update

From: Ed Maste <emaste_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 08:15:56 -0400

On 22 August 2017 at 07:46, David Wolfskill <david_at_catwhisker.org> wrote:
>
> lldb's notion of the backtrace was fairly non-useful:
> g1-252(11.1-S)[7] lldb -c sh.core

Try:
% lldb /bin/sh -c sh.core

Received on Tue Aug 22 2017 - 10:16:18 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Wolfskill: "Re: SIGSEGV in /bin/sh after r322740 -> r322776 update"
Previous message: Konstantin Belousov: "Re: SIGSEGV in /bin/sh after r322740 -> r322776 update"
In reply to: David Wolfskill: "SIGSEGV in /bin/sh after r322740 -> r322776 update"
Next in thread: David Wolfskill: "Re: SIGSEGV in /bin/sh after r322740 -> r322776 update"
Reply: David Wolfskill: "Re: SIGSEGV in /bin/sh after r322740 -> r322776 update"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:12 UTC