Tijl Coosemans tijl at FreeBSD.org wrote on Wed Aug 23 14:38:27 UTC 2017 : > The following program segfaults for me on amd64 when linked like this: > > cc -o test test.c -lpthread -L/usr/local/lib/gcc5 -lgcc_s -rpath /usr/local/lib/gcc5 > > -------------------------------- > #include <pthread.h> > #include <stdio.h> > > void * > thr( void *arg ) { > return( NULL ); > } > > int > main( void ) { > pthread_t thread; > > for( int i = 1; i < 20; i++ ) { > fprintf( stderr, "%d\n", i ); > pthread_create( &thread, NULL, thr, NULL ); > pthread_join( thread, NULL ); > } > return( 0 ); > } > -------------------------------- > > The backtrace looks like this: > > Thread 7 received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > [Switching to LWP 100511 of process 1886] > uw_frame_state_for (context= > context at entry > =0x7fffdfffddc0, > fs= > fs at entry > =0x7fffdfffdb10) > at /usr/ports/lang/gcc5/work/gcc-5.4.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2.c:1249 > 1249 /usr/ports/lang/gcc5/work/gcc-5.4.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2.c: No such file or directory. > (gdb) bt > #0 uw_frame_state_for (context= > context at entry > =0x7fffdfffddc0, > fs= > fs at entry > =0x7fffdfffdb10) > at /usr/ports/lang/gcc5/work/gcc-5.4.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2.c:1249 > #1 0x0000000800a66ecb in _Unwind_ForcedUnwind_Phase2 ( > exc= > exc at entry=0x800658730, context=context at entry > =0x7fffdfffddc0) > at /usr/ports/lang/gcc5/work/gcc-5.4.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:155 > #2 0x0000000800a67200 in _Unwind_ForcedUnwind (exc=0x800658730, > stop=0x8008428b0 <thread_unwind_stop>, stop_argument=0x0) > at /usr/ports/lang/gcc5/work/gcc-5.4.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:207 > #3 0x0000000800842224 in _Unwind_ForcedUnwind (ex=0x800658730, > stop_func=0x8008428b0 <thread_unwind_stop>, stop_arg=0x0) > at /usr/src/lib/libthr/thread/thr_exit.c:106 > #4 0x000000080084269f in thread_unwind () > at /usr/src/lib/libthr/thread/thr_exit.c:172 > #5 0x00000008008424d6 in _pthread_exit_mask (status=0x0, mask=0x0) > at /usr/src/lib/libthr/thread/thr_exit.c:254 > #6 0x0000000800842359 in _pthread_exit (status=0x0) > at /usr/src/lib/libthr/thread/thr_exit.c:206 > #7 0x000000080082ccb1 in thread_start (curthread=0x800658500) > at /usr/src/lib/libthr/thread/thr_create.c:289 > #8 0x00007fffdfdfe000 in ?? () > Backtrace stopped: Cannot access memory at address 0x7fffdfffe000 > > > It happens with gcc6 as well, but not with base libgcc_s. > Can anyone reproduce this? Have there been any changes to stack > unwinding recently (last few months)? This example might make a good addition to bugzilla 221288 that has some material from a more complicated example of problems mixing /usr/local/lib/gcc7/libgcc_s.so.1 and pthread. (Threading need not be the only problem context.) Here the source code is nice and short where the C++ example was large enough that I did not bother to submit it and I've not made a smaller example. The bigger C++ example had: # ldd a.out a.out: libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/gcc7/libstdc++.so.6 (0x800844000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x800bd8000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/gcc7/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x800e05000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x80101c000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x801244000) # ./a.out . . . (omitted) . . . Segmentation fault (core dumped) It was the -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc7 that forced the gcc7 variant of libgcc_s to be used. Any combination that had /lib/libthr.so.3 mixed with /usr/local/lib/gcc7/libgcc_s.so.1 failed. Any combination that had /lib/libthr.so.3 mixed with /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 worked. Of course /lib/libthr.so.3 was built based on /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 . === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.netReceived on Wed Aug 23 2017 - 17:41:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:13 UTC