On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Ed Schouten <ed_at_nuxi.nl> wrote: > 2017-08-25 9:46 GMT+02:00 Mark Millard <markmi_at_dsl-only.net>: > > It appears that at least 11.1-STABLE -r322807 does not handle > > -std=c++98 styles of use of _Static_assert for g++7 in that > > g++7 reports an error: > > Maybe we need to do something like this? > > Index: sys/sys/cdefs.h > =================================================================== > --- sys/sys/cdefs.h (revision 322887) > +++ sys/sys/cdefs.h (working copy) > _at__at_ -294,7 +294,7 _at__at_ > #if (defined(__cplusplus) && __cplusplus >= 201103L) || \ > __has_extension(cxx_static_assert) > #define _Static_assert(x, y) static_assert(x, y) > -#elif __GNUC_PREREQ__(4,6) > +#elif __GNUC_PREREQ__(4,6) && !defined(__cplusplus) > /* Nothing, gcc 4.6 and higher has _Static_assert built-in */ > #elif defined(__COUNTER__) > #define _Static_assert(x, y) __Static_assert(x, __COUNTER__) This looks good to my eye, but my level of C++ pedantic knowledge is suboptimal. WarnerReceived on Fri Aug 25 2017 - 13:12:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:13 UTC