Re: !EARLY_AP_STARTUP and -CURRENT

From: John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:38:29 -0700
On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 04:54:07 PM Kevin Bowling wrote:
> I'm dealing with a shit sandwich right now where the mps(4) or cam_da
> reorders drives on a few thousand legacy MBR machines I have (and I
> can't easily install glabel ATM), and !EARLY_AP_STARTUP seems to have
> regressed.  I'd like to be able to run w/o EARLY_AP_STARTUP right
> quick so I can take a more leisurely approach to fixing mps(4) boot
> probe correctly (freebsd-scsi_at_ has that thread).
> 
> With WITNESS and !EARLY_AP_STARTUP I hit an assert in sched_setpreempt
> in kern/sched_ule.c 100% of the time.  Here are a couple invocations,
> with oddness around a different CPU holding the curthread lock but
> somehow a different AP is runnable in the function:

Do you have the panic messages?

> Tracing pid 11 tid 100020 td 0xfffff80128cd1560
> kdb_enter() at kdb_enter+0x3b/frame 0xfffffe3e653dcc10
> vpanic() at vpanic+0x1b9/frame 0xfffffe3e653dcc90
> panic() at panic+0x43/frame 0xfffffe3e653dccf0
> __mtx_assert() at __mtx_assert+0xb4/frame 0xfffffe3e653dcd00
> sched_add() at sched_add+0x152/frame 0xfffffe3e653dcd40
> intr_event_schedule_thread() at intr_event_schedule_thread+0xca/frame
> 0xfffffe3e653dcd80
> swi_sched() at swi_sched+0x6c/frame 0xfffffe3e653dcdc0
> softclock_call_cc() at softclock_call_cc+0x155/frame 0xfffffe3e653dce70
> callout_process() at callout_process+0x1f9/frame 0xfffffe3e653dcef0
> handleevents() at handleevents+0x1a4/frame 0xfffffe3e653dcf30
> cpu_initclocks_ap() at cpu_initclocks_ap+0xc8/frame 0xfffffe3e653dcf60
> init_secondary_tail() at init_secondary_tail+0x1e3/frame 0xfffffe3e653dcf90
> init_secondary() at init_secondary+0x2b3/frame 0xfffffe3e653dcff0
> 
> 
> db> show thread 0xfffff80128cd1560
> Thread 100020 at 0xfffff80128cd1560:
>  proc (pid 11): 0xfffff80128cb5000
>  name: idle: cpu17
>  stack: 0xfffffe3e5cd88000-0xfffffe3e5cd8bfff
>  flags: 0x40024  pflags: 0x200000
>  state: CAN RUN
>  priority: 255
>  container lock: sched lock 0 (0xffffffff81c39800)
> db> show lock 0xffffffff81c39800
>  class: spin mutex
>  name: sched lock 0
>  flags: {SPIN, RECURSE}
>  state: {OWNED}
>  owner: 0xfffff80128cca000 (tid 100017, pid 11, "idle: cpu14")
> 
> 
> db> bt
> Tracing pid 11 tid 100021 td 0xfffff80128cd2000
> kdb_enter() at kdb_enter+0x3b/frame 0xfffffe3e655e4c10
> vpanic() at vpanic+0x1b9/frame 0xfffffe3e655e4c90
> panic() at panic+0x43/frame 0xfffffe3e655e4cf0
> __mtx_assert() at __mtx_assert+0xb4/frame 0xfffffe3e655e4d00
> sched_add() at sched_add+0x152/frame 0xfffffe3e655e4d40
> intr_event_schedule_thread() at intr_event_schedule_thread+0xca/frame
> 0xfffffe3e655e4d80
> swi_sched() at swi_sched+0x6c/frame 0xfffffe3e655e4dc0
> softclock_call_cc() at softclock_call_cc+0x155/frame 0xfffffe3e655e4e70
> callout_process() at callout_process+0x1f9/frame 0xfffffe3e655e4ef0
> handleevents() at handleevents+0x1a4/frame 0xfffffe3e655e4f30
> cpu_initclocks_ap() at cpu_initclocks_ap+0xc8/frame 0xfffffe3e655e4f60
> init_secondary_tail() at init_secondary_tail+0x1e3/frame 0xfffffe3e655e4f90
> init_secondary() at init_secondary+0x2b3/frame 0xfffffe3e655e4ff0
> db> show thread 0xfffff80128cd2000
> Thread 100021 at 0xfffff80128cd2000:
>  proc (pid 11): 0xfffff80128cb6000
>  name: idle: cpu18
>  stack: 0xfffffe3e5cf17000-0xfffffe3e5cf1afff
>  flags: 0x40024  pflags: 0x200000
>  state: CAN RUN
>  priority: 255
>  container lock: sched lock 0 (0xffffffff81c39800)
> db> show lock 0xffffffff81c39800
>  class: spin mutex
>  name: sched lock 0
>  flags: {SPIN, RECURSE}
>  state: {OWNED}
>  owner: 0xfffff80128cdb560 (tid 100028, pid 11, "idle: cpu25")
> 
> Regards,
> Kevin


-- 
John Baldwin
Received on Thu Aug 31 2017 - 13:03:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:13 UTC