Re: [PATCH] Document powl and tgammal kludges

From: Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 09:12:28 -0800
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 05:44:33PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2017, at 02:02, Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > The following patch documents the remaining kludges that
> > theraven_at_ committed in r255294 on 2013-09-06.  I have
> > cleaned up all of the others, but powl and tgammal remain.
> > ngie_at_ seems to have documented the existence of powl with
> > r290605, but did not document the rather poor numerical
> > accuracy of the result.  tgammal remains undocumented.  As it
> > is unlikely that theraven_at_ will document the nature of his
> > kludge nor the existence of tgammal,  I have have prepared
> > a patch that documents the expected numerical accuracy in BUGS
> > sections, and have also documented tgammal.
> 
> Thanks, committed in r326748.
> 

Thanks for the quick commit.

-- 
Steve
Received on Sun Dec 10 2017 - 16:12:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:14 UTC