> On 9. veebr 2017, at 23:39, Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo_at_bluezbox.com> wrote: > > Toomas Soome (tsoome_at_me.com) wrote: >> >>> On 9. veebr 2017, at 17:05, Karl Denninger <karl_at_denninger.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2/9/2017 08:58, Toomas Soome wrote: >>>>> On 9. veebr 2017, at 16:36, Karl Denninger <karl_at_denninger.net> <mailto:karl_at_denninger.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2/8/2017 16:18, Karl Denninger wrote: >>>>>> r313441 blows up on the Pi3 in /boot/loader.efi with: >>>>>> >>>>>> FreeBSD/arm64 EFI loader, Revision 1.1 >>>>>> (Tue Feb 7 15:15:52 CST 2017 freebsd_at_NewFS.denninger.net <mailto:freebsd_at_NewFS.denninger.net>) >>>>>> Failed to start image provided by UFS (14) >>>>>> "Synchronous Abort" handler, esr 0x96000004 >>>>>> ELR: 3af62cec >>>>>> LR: 3af61d60 >>>>>> x0 : 0000000000000001 x1 : 0000000000000001 >>>>>> x2 : 000000003afeb000 x3 : 000000000000003f >>>>>> x4 : 0000000000000020 x5 : 0000000000000010 >>>>>> x6 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 0000000039b260a4 >>>>>> x8 : 000000003af61d48 x9 : 000000000000000d >>>>>> x10: 0000000000000030 x11: 0000000000000000 >>>>>> x12: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000002 >>>>>> x14: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000 >>>>>> x16: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000000000 >>>>>> x18: 000000003ab30df8 x19: 0000000037a16008 >>>>>> x20: 0000000000000000 x21: 0000000000000000 >>>>>> x22: 0000000039b28000 x23: 0000000039b1d49c >>>>>> x24: 0000000039b28850 x25: 000000003ab3d740 >>>>>> x26: 000000003af839a0 x27: 0000000039b2e3e8 >>>>>> x28: 0000000000000000 x29: 000000003ab2ef60 >>>>>> >>>>>> Resetting CPU ... >>>>>> >>>>>> If you copy in a loader.efi from an earlier build (e.g. r313109) then the system boots but complains about SMP problems, fails to start any of the other CPUs (although it sees them) and panics before it reaches a login prompt with what appears to be a problem reading the SD card (I also get a couple of lor's in here too..... not sure if those are "real" or false positives) >>>>>> >>>>>> B >>>>> This has been isolated to r313333 in sys/boot/efi; reverting the EFI >>>>> loader to a previous revision stops the crash. >>>>> >>>>> Filed here: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216940 <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216940> <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216940> <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216940> >>>>> >>>> Does it still crash with r313442? I think it does and this is why: >>>> >>>> From your log above, the hint is "Failed to start image provided by UFS (14)”, so what we can guess here is that for some reason the loader.efi main() failed to detect the boot device, and did return back to boot1. >>>> >>>> Boot1 did print out this error message and did call panic(). So, the question is, why it is failing to detect the root fs handle. I’ll try to check if I can replicate the issue with x86 + ufs. >>>> >>>> BTW: sorry for trouble:) >>>> >>>> rgds, >>>> toomas >>>> >>> Yes. >>> >>> It's isolated to that particular revision, which appears to have reworked the enumeration of the available devices to boot from. Reverting only sys/boot/efi to anything before 313333 (e.g. "svn update -r 313332 ." in src/sys/boot/efi) and rebuilding results in a loader.efi that successfully loads and starts the kernel. >>> >> >> Well, the x86 version does not appear to have problems with finding the ufs devices. So this has to be some sort of corner case related to arm:( unfortunately I do not have much variants to test arm, except qemu… so some help would be needed there. Since the only crash is from boot1 call to panic, I am pretty sure the disk detection and setup was ok, so we should get disk list if we insert something like: >> >> for (i = 0; devsw[i] != NULL; i++) { >> if (devsw[i]->dv_print != NULL){ >> if (devsw[i]->dv_print(verbose)) >> break; >> } >> } >> >> after dv_init() loop. >> >> If thats true, then it should not take too much to find why we fail to get the handle for root fs in case of arm… > > > On RPi3 U-Boot EFI API provided by U-Boot and it's somewhat non-standard > comapring to x86 EFI or specialized EFI firmwares of ARM64. I did some > debugging and found that U-Boot reports driver with subtype MEDIA_FILEPATH_DP > so it's not recognized by disk handler. Quick hack below fixed boot > but it's not ideal and the device structure looks like this: > > disk devices: > disk0: 15564801 X 512 blocks (removable) > disk0s1: DOS/Windows 49MB > disk0s2: FreeBSD 1856MB > disk0s2a: FreeBSD UFS 1856MB > disk1: 102375 X 512 blocks (removable) > disk2: 3802112 X 512 blocks (removable) > disk2a: FreeBSD UFS 1856MB > net devices: > net0: > > > disk1 and disk2 are actuallypartitions from disk0. > I can work on proper fix but not sure what should be > considered proper in this case. So some guidelines are welcome I think Karl got or is getting the same result as I am writing - we did reach to the same point:) Yep, the idea behind the efipart_hdinfo_add() is that the first argument is handle to the disk itself, so we can sort the partition handles into the partition list in the disk. I think the logical step from there would be to dig out the path structure and see if we can use something to identify the disk itself. So, the interesting part here also is that in your case it did dig out the BSD label too. Ok, so the MEDIA_FILEPATH_DP has last node as CHAR16 file name, so we need to pick the last node and cast to FILEPATH_DEVICE_PATH and then we can see what that CHAR16 there has:) Also we may need to inspect all the nodes on the path, then we have idea. Once we have method to identify the disk itself, then we should have the solution. rgds, toomas > > Patch: > Index: boot/efi/libefi/efipart.c > =================================================================== > --- boot/efi/libefi/efipart.c (revision 313477) > +++ boot/efi/libefi/efipart.c (working copy) > _at__at_ -467,6 +467,15 _at__at_ > efipart_hdinfo_add(handle, efipart_handles[i]); > continue; > } > + > + /* > + * U-Boot case > + */ > + if (DevicePathType(node) == MEDIA_DEVICE_PATH && > + DevicePathSubType(node) == MEDIA_FILEPATH_DP) { > + efipart_hdinfo_add(efipart_handles[i], efipart_handles[i]); > + continue; > + } > } > }Received on Thu Feb 09 2017 - 21:02:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:10 UTC