Hi, Is the following a bug or feature. I observe that the first thread in a procedure is not passed to thread_dtor as declared by the following eventhandler, when the procedure exits. EVENTHANDLER_DECLARE(thread_dtor, thread_dtor_fn); Is this a bug or feature? I see a couple of clients in the kernel and if the first thread in proc is simply recycled by re-init, we're leaking data for these clients? And I'm planning to add one more for the LinuxKPI. Any insight? --HPSReceived on Sat Feb 18 2017 - 20:40:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:10 UTC