On 6 Jan 2017, at 12:48, Pete Wright wrote: > On 1/6/17 9:14 AM, Matthew Macy wrote: >> >> I just did the merge and it's using a relatively untested new KPI so >> regressions aren't too surprising I'm afraid. #96 is more or less >> content free in terms of providing useful information. Getting a core >> + backtrace would be a lot more helpful. See the repo's wiki for >> details on improving your odds of getting a core. >> > > I have found the following has enabled me to catch kernel panic's > pretty reliably on the drm-next branch when i have the i915kms module > loaded: > > dev.drm.skip_ddb=1 Excellent: I turned that on and got a core, then got another core while tar'ing up the first core. :) The machine in question is currently not connected to any network (iwm is being a bit unhappy), but once it is, where can I put the tarball? Jon -- jonathan.anderson_at_ieee.orgReceived on Fri Jan 06 2017 - 17:44:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:09 UTC