Re: HEADS-UP: IFLIB implementations of sys/dev/e1000 em, lem, igb pending

From: Matthew Macy <mmacy_at_nextbsd.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:49:53 -0800
 > >  > My tunning are (same for both test):
 > >  > hw.igb.rxd="2048" (it should be useless now)
 > >  > hw.igb.txd="2048" (it should be useless now)
 > 
 > Matt: I think he meant "useless now" because there is no igb, and the
 > below hw.em version covers it.


No. igb still exists and the old tunables no work.
-M

 > >  > hw.em.rxd="2048"
 > >  > hw.em.txd="2048"
 > >  > hw.igb.rx_process_limit="-1" (It should be useless now too)
 > >  > hw.em.rx_process_limit="-1"
 > >  > 
 > >  > dev.igb.2.fc=0
 > >  > dev.igb.3.fc=0
 > >  > 
 > >  > I can generate profiling data for you: what kind of data do you want ?
 > >  >  
 > > 
 > > 
 > > _______________________________________________
 > > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
 > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
 > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
 > > 
 > 
 > 
 > -- 
 > Allan Jude
 > _______________________________________________
 > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
 > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
Received on Wed Jan 11 2017 - 20:49:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:09 UTC