Re: HEADS-UP: IFLIB implementations of sys/dev/e1000 em, lem, igb pending

On 01/11/17 15:44, Sean Bruno wrote:
> 
>> My tunning are (same for both test):
>> hw.igb.rxd="2048" (it should be useless now)
>> hw.igb.txd="2048" (it should be useless now)
>> hw.em.rxd="2048"
>> hw.em.txd="2048"
>> hw.igb.rx_process_limit="-1" (It should be useless now too)
>> hw.em.rx_process_limit="-1"
>>
>> dev.igb.2.fc=0
>> dev.igb.3.fc=0
>>
>> I can generate profiling data for you: what kind of data do you want ?
> 
> 
> Specifically, you may want to adjust these:
> 
> dev.em.0.iflib.override_nrxds: 0
> dev.em.0.iflib.override_ntxds: 0
> 
> dev.em.0.iflib.override_nrxqs: 0
> dev.em.0.iflib.override_ntxqs: 0
> 
> sean
> 

dev.igb.0 .... but you get the point.

sean