On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 09:00:52 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 01/18/17 02:18, John Baldwin wrote: > > You might still want to adjust 'nextevent' to schedule the next interrupt > > to be sooner than 'timerperiod' though. You could just set 'nextevent' to > > 'now' in that case instead of 'next'. > > Right, I'll give that a spin. Would have to be "now + 1" instead of > "now", due to check before et_start() ? Ugh, ok. + 1 with sbintime_t is kind of odd which is why I would have liked to avoid it, but it seems it is required. -- John BaldwinReceived on Wed Jan 18 2017 - 16:03:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:09 UTC