Re: ISO image: where is the CLANG compiler?

On 2017-01-18 14:37, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Am Wed, 18 Jan 2017 16:38:32 +0100
> Matthias Apitz <guru_at_unixarea.de> schrieb:
> 
>> Why you do not just boot from USB some mem stick image, mount some disk
>> space to /mnt, svn checkout CURRENT to /mnt and build a booteable system
>> (world and kernel) and install to DESTDIR=/mnt ?
>>
>> I do not understand all this hassle?
>>
>> 	matthias
>>
> 
> Wow!
> 
> As I initially stated, that is EXACTLY what I was inclined to do except the fact that I
> had already an intact /usr/obj and usr/src with a complete compiled system.
> 
> I booted from mem stick and I was lost due to no cc!
> 
> Even for "make installworld" it seems I have to rely on the compiler. And the images
> (ISO, memstick et cetera) provided these days do not contain any clang.
> 
> So, I tried /usr/src/release ... for the first time. The image does also not contain the
> necessary tools for a full "make installworld installkernel" - not to speak of
> "compiling" world. I dodn't work (at least for me). 
> 
> I try to figure out how to avoid this crazy and useless shrinking of the ISO images -
> somehow when building NanoBSD, there are knobs with which we can prevent the build and/or
> installation of subsets like compiler, toolchain et cetera. The way such thing is
> provided via src.conf and make.conf is fine and sophisticated. But "RELEASE" seems to
> handle things different, and the standard is useless for a rescue mission.
> 
> So far.
> 
> It might be that I have overlooked something ...
> 
> Regards,
> 
> oh
> 

The DVD should still contain clang. Only the smaller images (bootonly,
disc1) should have clang removed.

-- 
Allan Jude