On 07/07/17 21:53, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2017-Jul-07 10:44:36 -0400, Michael Butler <imb_at_protected-networks.net> wrote: >> Recent builds doing a backup (dump) cause nonsensical errors in syslog: > > I can't directly offer any ideas but some more background might help: > When did you first notice this (what SVN revision)? I was stuck on SVN r319721 on the i386 machine while the socket/union issue was addressed. That version did not display the problem. > Do you know what the last good SVN revision was? > Is this a new or old filesystem? old - it's been years since this system was rebuilt. > Is the filesystem mounted/active or not when you dump it? Mounted and active. > What are the relevant parameters for the filesystem on ada0s3a? imb_at_toshi:/home/imb> dumpfs / magic 19540119 (UFS2) time Fri Jul 7 22:43:49 2017 superblock location 65536 id [ 56c8bf68 1a8b12b5 ] ncg 516 size 82575360 blocks 79978821 bsize 32768 shift 15 mask 0xffff8000 fsize 4096 shift 12 mask 0xfffff000 frag 8 shift 3 fsbtodb 3 minfree 8% optim time symlinklen 120 maxbsize 32768 maxbpg 4096 maxcontig 4 contigsumsize 4 nbfree 3965346 ndir 98169 nifree 40196026 nffree 453383 bpg 20035 fpg 160280 ipg 80256 unrefs 0 nindir 4096 inopb 128 maxfilesize 2252349704110079 sbsize 4096 cgsize 32768 csaddr 5056 cssize 12288 sblkno 24 cblkno 32 iblkno 40 dblkno 5056 cgrotor 253 fmod 0 ronly 0 clean 0 metaspace 6408 avgfpdir 64 avgfilesize 16384 flags soft-updates fsmnt / volname swuid 0 providersize 82575360 [ .. ] > Are you running softupdates, journalling etc? soft-updates only. > Which dump(8) phase is reporting the errors? The errors occur before the "date of the last level x dump" message - presumably, this is while creating the snapshot. > What are the exact dump and fsck commands you ran? /sbin/dump 0Lauf - -C 32 / none of the following report any (unexpected) errors: fsck -f / fsck -f -r / fsck -f -Z / > >> I now have two UFS-based systems showing the same symptoms - what's up >> with this? > > Was there anything you did on either filesystem that might have triggered it? Other than update the kernel, no. MichaelReceived on Sat Jul 08 2017 - 00:57:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:12 UTC