On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 01:10:21PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:45:07AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > > > > Summary of the transition interval: > > > > So for powerpc64 (and powerpc?) It is a good > > idea to avoid anything that is after -r313254 > > and before -r314474 in head. (Would this be > > appropriate for a UPDATING notice given its > > span?) > > > > There may be other architectures that might have > > a similar status(?): the last fixes involved were > > not in Machine Dependent code. (Some architectures > > are apparently insensitive to the errors, such as > > amd64). > > > > When following current you are expected to be on the newest revision, > so I don't think mentioning interim broken releases makes much sense. > Documenting the range may aid those bisecting src/ to find a bug. How is one to know that anything in the range that Mark points out should be skipped on powerpc64? -- SteveReceived on Thu Mar 02 2017 - 14:20:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:10 UTC