Re: ino64? r318606 -> r318739 OK; r318739 -> r318781 fails SIGSEGV

From: Peter Jeremy <peter_at_rulingia.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 15:34:25 +1000
On 2017-May-24 20:21:54 +0300, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>No SIGSEGV etc, so I think that the effects seen are due to build system.
>rm -rf obj/* is the safest trick, I believe.

But the behaviour does indicate that meta mode is not doing the right thing
under all circumstances.  It's blatently breaking in this scenario but could
be causing more subtle (and unnoticed) breakage in other cases.  This makes
me feel that this is worth investigating further.

-- 
Peter Jeremy

Received on Thu May 25 2017 - 03:34:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:11 UTC