On 06/11/2017 19:26, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 17:40 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> From UPDATING: >> The naive and non-compliant support of posix_fallocate(2) in ZFS >> has been removed as of r325320. The system call now returns EINVAL >> when used on a ZFS file. Although the new behavior complies with the >> standard, some consumers are not prepared to cope with it. >> One known victim is lld prior to r325420. >> > > It just popped into my head... does this mean that kernels running > r325320+ on systems using ZFS will be unable to host build jails for > earlier versions / branches because lld will fail in the jail? I am afraid that this is true. > I think that will be a big problem for the ports team's package > building process, and for anyone using poudriere. I hope that lld is not that widely used now. But I admit that I put the cart before the horse. I didn't expect that posix_fallocate is used in the development toolchain and I didn't try to check for it. -- Andriy GaponReceived on Tue Nov 07 2017 - 17:12:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:13 UTC