On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:51:24 +0200, "O. Hartmann" <ohartmann_at_walstatt.org> wrote: > When using "poudriere", it seems ABI is freebsd:12:x86:64. When using FreeBSD base, it > seems always to be referred to FreeBSD:12:amd64. What now? All non-BSD world uses x86:64, > FreeBSD is using amd64, but why is this used inconsistently all over the places? > > I run into trouble setting up some package- and base-servers and ran into the problem > when deleting - not thinking of this discovered inconsistency - some links on the servers > regarding FreeBSD:12:x86:64 (the same is for 11-STABLE). > > Can someone shed some light onto this? > > What am I supposed to use now? The handbook referes to amd64, so I thought poudriere > would, too. > > Thanks in advance, > > oh > -- > O. Hartmann > > Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder Übermittlung meiner Daten für > Werbezwecke oder für die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (§ 28 Abs. 4 BDSG). [ not using poudriere yet ] /me too I think three places [ etc/pkg, /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos, 2nd place in base, ] fourth: hard coded DESPITE the above in the current DB in var/db/pkg? fifth: derived somehow from uname -a? here: freebsd:12:x86:32 ... when this issue resolved, could it please be added to 'man pkg|poudriere|syntch|portmaster?|portupgrade? [ the latter two when developed further ]'Received on Tue Oct 03 2017 - 08:43:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:13 UTC