On 30.10.17 15:32, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 20:40:46 +0100 Andreas Tobler <andreast-list_at_fgznet.ch> wrote: >> Attached what I have for libgcc. It can be applied to gcc5-8, should >> give no issues. The mentioned tc from this thread and mine, >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82635 do pass. >> >> What do you think? > > Like I said before the return address can be anything. It could for > instance point to some instruction in a random function and then the > stack unwinder will think thread_start was called from that function. > There's no check you can add to libgcc to distinguish that from a > normal valid return address. > Maybe not, and most probably I do not understand what is happening. But with my modification I survive the test case. If no objections from your or Konstantin's side come up I will commit it to the gcc repo. It will not 'fix' the issue, but it will improve the gcc behavior. AndreasReceived on Mon Oct 30 2017 - 20:54:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:13 UTC