On 12/9/17 2:17 pm, Conrad Meyer wrote: > On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Julian Elischer <julian_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >> maybe we could get it into -current. >> It'd be silly to have to have people re-inventing hte wheel all the time. >> How about you put those changes into the reviews.freebsd.org and we can get >> some general consensus on them. >> We'll have to do similar for the Asian customers and anyone who uses UTF-8. >> So it >> would be silly to have to develop it all again (but subtly different of >> course). >> >> The key issue is how many system calls and other APIs would be broken, >> and how many would be broken in a non backwards compatible way? >> >> We would need it in a stable/10 and 11 branch but if the patch is isolated >> enough we could carry it forward until we get to 12. >> >> One has to allow people to do whatever they are used to with Windows. >> And in this case the issue is serving files over samba to windows machines. > Hey Julian, > > I've thrown the patch up at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12330 . I > haven't actually tested it on FreeBSD, but it does compile. We also > have some patches against contrib/pjdfstest to fix those tests against > long file names, but I think we can hold off on those changes until > we've nailed down what the architectural change will be (if any). Hi Conrad, This patch makes me think about another related bug #184340 : https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184340 It is about PATH_MAX which in some cases can be too small. Not sure if it's the case / and how to do it, but perhaps it is time to raise some other limits / think about a global solution regarding these length limits ? Many thanks ! BenReceived on Tue Sep 12 2017 - 19:11:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:13 UTC