Re: clang manual page?

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:56:24PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> I never said that you said it was in base.  I'm noting that
> referring a user to a non-existent manual page is of little
> help.  In fact, your 7 word response is an affirmation that
> the tools supplied in base should be properly documented.

It would probably be more useful to file explicit bug reports
(or even write a patch) about missing or poor documentation, than
to proffer passive-aggressive inquiries on public mailing lists
that merely suggest but do not explicitly state that the
documentation is deficient.

Thanks,

Ben