On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 3:37 AM, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel_at_gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 11:27:02PM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:10 PM, Eitan Adler <lists_at_eitanadler.com> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > After installing the latest current kernel I get the following panic: >> > >> > panic: mutex pmap not owned at ... efirt_machdep.c:255 >> > cpuid =3 >> > time = 1 >> > ... >> > mtx_assert() >> > efi_arch_enter() >> > efirt_modevents() >> > module_register_init() >> > mi_startup() >> > btext() >> > >> >> This seems odd- pmap lock is acquired at [1], then asserted shortly >> later at [2]... I avoid some of this stuff as well as I can, but is it >> actually possible for PCPU_GET(...) acquired curpmap to not match >> curthread->td_proc->p_vmspace->vm_pmap in this context? >> >> [1] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/dev/efidev/efirt.c?view=markup#l260 >> [2] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/amd64/amd64/efirt_machdep.c?view=markup#l254 > There could be that curpcpu not yet synced with proc0 pmap. It could be > fixed. > He now gets a little further, but ends up with the same panic due to efirtc_probe trying to get time to verify the rtc's actually implemented. What kind of approach must we take to ensure curcpu is synced?Received on Sun Aug 05 2018 - 00:47:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:17 UTC