On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 08:29:49PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: | On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 11:50:44AM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote: | > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:09 AM, Eitan Adler <eadler_at_freebsd.org> wrote: | > > On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 11:27, Kyle Evans <kevans_at_freebsd.org> wrote: | > >> | > >> On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 5:43 AM, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel_at_gmail.com> wrote: | > >> > On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 09:46:39PM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote: | > >> >> | > >> >> He now gets a little further, but ends up with the same panic due to | > >> >> efirtc_probe trying to get time to verify the rtc's actually | > >> >> implemented. What kind of approach must we take to ensure curcpu is | > >> >> synced? | > >> > | > >> > It does not panic for me, when I load efirt.ko from the loader prompt. | > >> > Anyway, try this | > >> | > >> Right, I also don't get a panic on any of my machines from this. | > >> Hopefully he'll have a chance to try this soon. | > > | > > This change has no impact: it still panics in the same way as without the patch. | > > | > | > That seems indicative of a bigger problem, since we use proc0 | > throughout all these bits so we should still be dealing with the same | > pmap that got passed to pmap_pinit0 when we grab | > curthread->td_proc->p_vmspace->vm_pmap. | | Can you confirm that you get the early efi_enter() call from rtc code, | when you preload the module or compile it into the kernel ? When I ran into this, I did this change: Index: dev/efidev/efirt.c =================================================================== --- dev/efidev/efirt.c (revision 337264) +++ dev/efidev/efirt.c (working copy) _at__at_ -257,7 +257,8 _at__at_ if (efi_runtime == NULL) return (ENXIO); td = curthread; - curpmap = &td->td_proc->p_vmspace->vm_pmap; +// curpmap = &td->td_proc->p_vmspace->vm_pmap; + curpmap = PCPU_GET(curpmap); PMAP_LOCK(curpmap); mtx_lock(&efi_lock); fpu_kern_enter(td, NULL, FPU_KERN_NOCTX); _at__at_ -272,7 +273,8 _at__at_ efi_arch_leave(); - curpmap = &curproc->p_vmspace->vm_pmap; +// curpmap = &curproc->p_vmspace->vm_pmap; + curpmap = PCPU_GET(curpmap); td = curthread; fpu_kern_leave(td, NULL); mtx_unlock(&efi_lock); Don't know if it is right. Some previous code used both curpmap = PCPU_GET(curpmap); and curpmap = &td->td_proc->p_vmspace->vm_pmap; recently it was changes to only use curpmap = &td->td_proc->p_vmspace->vm_pmap; Things seem to work after that. I was able to repro. it with qemu-system-x86_64 in UEFI mode. I think it also failed in bhyve UEFI mode. Thanks, Doug A.Received on Tue Aug 07 2018 - 19:49:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:17 UTC