Re: programs like gdb core dump

On 8/8/18 4:49 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> here we are:
> 
> http://sumeritec/FreeBSD/fortune.core
> http://sumeritec/FreeBSD/gdb.core
> 
> The fortune core is from the same source as the now running system. The
> gdb core should be but I am not 100% sure.
> 
> Revision: Revision: 337343

The core dumps don't really do me any good unfortunately without a binary,
but if you can open fortune.core under gdb for example, just getting the
stack trace along with 'info reg' is probably sufficient.
 
> Erich
> 
> 
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 08:57:06 -0700
> John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 8/7/18 7:00 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 11:59:11 -0700
>>> John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> On 8/6/18 8:11 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:  
>>>>> On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 15:57:53 -0700
>>>>> John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>> On 8/4/18 4:38 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:    
>>>   
>>>>>>> Bad system call (core dumped)  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you upgrade from stable/11 with a world that is still
>>>>>> stable/11? If so, did you make sure your kernel config includes
>>>>>> COMPAT_FREEBSD11? (GENERIC should include this)
>>>>>>    
>>>>>
>>>>> I never have had a machine running 11. This machine is on 12 since
>>>>> 2 or 3 years. I will check if this configuration was properly set
>>>>> on that machine.    
>>>>
>>>> Ahh, a fairly old 12 world with a recent 12 kernel will still need
>>>> COMPAT_FREEBSD11.
>>>>  
>>>
>>> even when kernel and world are on '1200076' as provided by uname
>>> -U/-K, COMPAT_FREEBSD11 is required at the moment. The system is
>>> currently on r337343.  
>>
>> Hmm, plain 12.0 binaries that are up to date should not need
>> COMPAT_FREEBSD11. Do you have any of the core dumps from before handy?
>>
> 


-- 
John Baldwin