On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Larry Rosenman <ler_at_lerctr.org> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 11:28:10AM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote: >> > filesystem? >> > >> >> (CC'ing jhb_at_ and tychon_at_, who might have better insight) >> >> If we can swing it, I think the best model here should have always >> been that userboot uses the host's scripts but the guest's >> loader.conf. The current model doesn't tolerate any mismatch between >> host and guest and looks unsustainable. > > Yeah, I have a FreeBSD-10, and a HardendBSD-12 VM, and BOTH failed until > I loaded the old /boot/userboot.so to my host. > > We really need to tolerate this condition, and NOT surprise the user. Right. That's what we're trying to figure out here, the best route forward to make this stuff reliably work.Received on Sun Aug 19 2018 - 14:36:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:17 UTC