Re: priority of paths to kernel modules?

From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert_at_cschubert.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:29:20 -0700
In message <1535127391.1488.23.camel_at_freebsd.org>, Ian Lepore writes:
> On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 08:35 -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > My idea, which I implemented locally and should probably create a
> > phab review, was to ifdef DRM in modules/Makefile. We could do this
> > too. Default not to build/install.
> > 
>
> This seems like the obvious fix. I thought the whole point of all this
> is that we support drm2 on some platforms, but not x86 anymore. So to
> me that implies not building the modules by default on x86.

Then we limit it knob to only those platforms we wish to remove it from 
now. I suggested default off however in a private email I received it 
was intimated to me that default on for the first while would be 
better. Personally, I don't care about the minutia but I do care that 
we have some kind of migration roadmap.


-- 
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert_at_cschubert.com>
FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy_at_FreeBSD.org>   Web:  http://www.FreeBSD.org

	The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
Received on Fri Aug 24 2018 - 16:32:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:18 UTC