beadm vs bectl

From: Pete Wright <pete_at_nomadlogic.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:50:35 -0700
hi there - i have a zfs based system where /boot is on its own pool.  
beadm seems happy enough with this setup but bectl errors out like so:

$ sudo bectl list
/ and /boot not on same device, quitting
$

$ beadm list
BE                 Active Mountpoint  Space Created
default            NR     /           47.6G 2018-03-02 20:30
snapshot_02262018  -      -            1.5G 2018-03-03 14:38
badresume_05122018 -      -            4.4G 2018-05-12 19:45
11_2_beta          -      -            2.6G 2018-05-13 18:26
resume_works       -      -           12.6G 2018-06-01 16:45
$

reading the manpage for bectl it doesn't mention this being an issue.  
so i guess i have two questions:
1) is it a bad thing(tm) to have /boot on its own pool?
2) assuming that having /boot on its  own pool, why does bectl not work 
with this configuration?

thanks!
-pete

-- 
Pete Wright
pete_at_nomadlogic.org
_at_nomadlogicLA
Received on Mon Aug 27 2018 - 16:50:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:18 UTC