On 2018-Feb-18, at 1:33 PM, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik_at_gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 9:38 PM, Trond Endrestøl < > Trond.Endrestol_at_fagskolen.gjovik.no> wrote: > >> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 11:51-0800, Mark Millard wrote: >> >>> Note: -r329448 was reverted in -r329461 : racy. >> >> True. I got a crash when compiling r329451 while running r329449. >> I've now booted the r329422 ZFS BE and I'm attempting to build >> r329529. >> > > Looking around strongly suggests r329448 is the culprit. If you can verify > 329447 works fine we are mostly done here. > > Note the revision got reverted and different variant got in in r329531. > > That said, if r329447 works then the issue should be already fixed and in > particular fresh head should work fine. My initial problem was with -r329465, which is after -r329461 reverted -r329488 . Trond reported in one note that he had problems with -r329464 , also after -r329488 was reverted. Trond has also reported -r329449 failed. I did manage to revert to -r329447 earlier and so far the results suggests that it works. From this I get that -r329449 is the the one that is common to all the so--far failing combinations. -r329448 is not common to all of them. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( markmi at dsl-only.net is going away in 2018-Feb, late)Received on Sun Feb 18 2018 - 20:56:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:15 UTC