Re: r327359: cylinder checksum failed: cg0, cgp: 0x4515d2a3 != bp: 0xd9fba319 Dec 30 23:29:24 <0.2>

From: Michael Tuexen <tuexen_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 19:52:19 +0100
> On 4. Jan 2018, at 12:14, O. Hartmann <ohartmann_at_walstatt.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 09:10:37 +0100
> Michael Tuexen <tuexen_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
>>> On 31. Dec 2017, at 02:45, Warner Losh <imp_at_bsdimp.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 4:41 PM, O. Hartmann <ohartmann_at_walstatt.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On most recent CURRENT I face the error shwon below on /tmp filesystem
>>>> (UFS2) residing
>>>> on a Samsung 850 Pro SSD:
>>>> 
>>>> UFS /dev/gpt/tmp (/tmp) cylinder checksum failed: cg 0, cgp: 0x4515d2a3 !=
>>>> bp: 0xd9fba319
>>>> handle_workitem_freefile: got error 5 while accessing filesystem
>>>> UFS /dev/gpt/tmp (/tmp) cylinder checksum failed: cg 0, cgp: 0x4515d2a3
>>>> != bp: 0xd9fba319
>>>> handle_workitem_freefile: got error 5 while accessing filesystem
>>>> UFS /dev/gpt/tmp (/tmp) cylinder checksum failed: cg 0, cgp: 0x4515d2a3
>>>> != bp: 0xd9fba319
>>>> handle_workitem_freefile: got error 5 while accessing filesystem
>>>> UFS /dev/gpt/tmp (/tmp) cylinder checksum failed: cg 0, cgp: 0x4515d2a3
>>>> != bp: 0xd9fba319
>>>> handle_workitem_freefile: got error 5 while accessing filesystem
>>>> UFS /dev/gpt/tmp (/tmp) cylinder checksum failed: cg 0, cgp: 0x4515d2a3
>>>> != bp: 0xd9fba319
>>>> handle_workitem_freefile: got error 5 while accessing filesystem
>>>> 
>>>> I've already formatted the /tmp filesystem, but obviously without any
>>>> success.
>>>> 
>>>> Since I face such strange errors also on NanoBSD images dd'ed to SD cards,
>>>> I guess there
>>>> is something fishy ...  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> It indicates a problem. We've seen these 'corruptions' on data in motion at
>>> work, but I hacked fsck to report checksum mismatches (it silently corrects
>>> them today) and we've not seen any mismatch when we unmount and fsck the
>>> filesystem.  
>> Not sure this helps: But we have seen this also after system panics
>> when having soft update journaling enabled. Having soft update journaling
>> disabled, we do not observed this after several panics.
>> Just to be clear: The panics are not related to this issue,
>> but to other network development we do.
>> 
>> You can check using tunefs -p devname if soft update journaling is enabled or
>> not.
> 
> In all cases I reported in earlier and now, softupdates ARE ENABLED on all
> partitions in question (always GPT, in my cases also all on flash based
> devices, SD card and/or SSD).
OK. That seems to be consistent. Here is the config I'm using on m-SATA SSDs
and I'm NOT experiencing the problem:

tunefs: POSIX.1e ACLs: (-a)                                disabled
tunefs: NFSv4 ACLs: (-N)                                   disabled
tunefs: MAC multilabel: (-l)                               disabled
tunefs: soft updates: (-n)                                 enabled
tunefs: soft update journaling: (-j)                       disabled
tunefs: gjournal: (-J)                                     disabled
tunefs: trim: (-t)                                         enabled
tunefs: maximum blocks per file in a cylinder group: (-e)  4096
tunefs: average file size: (-f)                            16384
tunefs: average number of files in a directory: (-s)       64
tunefs: minimum percentage of free space: (-m)             8%
tunefs: space to hold for metadata blocks: (-k)            6408
tunefs: optimization preference: (-o)                      time
tunefs: volume label: (-L)                                 

This was the config I was experiencing the problem:

tunefs: POSIX.1e ACLs: (-a)                                disabled
tunefs: NFSv4 ACLs: (-N)                                   disabled
tunefs: MAC multilabel: (-l)                               disabled
tunefs: soft updates: (-n)                                 enabled
tunefs: soft update journaling: (-j)                       enabled
tunefs: gjournal: (-J)                                     disabled
tunefs: trim: (-t)                                         enabled
tunefs: maximum blocks per file in a cylinder group: (-e)  4096
tunefs: average file size: (-f)                            16384
tunefs: average number of files in a directory: (-s)       64
tunefs: minimum percentage of free space: (-m)             8%
tunefs: space to hold for metadata blocks: (-k)            6408
tunefs: optimization preference: (-o)                      time
tunefs: volume label: (-L)                                 

So "soft updates" are enabled on both configs, but "soft update journaling" is different.

Maybe this helps in nailing down the problem.

Best regards
Michael

> 
>> 
>> Best regards
>> Michael
>>> 
>>> Warner
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"  
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
> 
Received on Thu Jan 04 2018 - 17:52:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:14 UTC