On 07/06/18 11:14, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 9:49 AM Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel_at_gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 09:52:24AM +0200, Niclas Zeising wrote: >>> On 07/06/18 00:02, Warner Losh wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 1:44 PM, John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org >>>> <mailto:jhb_at_freebsd.org>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 7/5/18 12:36 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >>>> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 09:12:24PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky >> wrote: >>>> >> On 07/05/18 20:59, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >>>> >>> On 07/05/18 19:48, Pete Wright wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 07/05/2018 10:10, John Baldwin wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 7/3/18 5:10 PM, Pete Wright wrote: >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> On 07/03/2018 15:56, John Baldwin wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> On 7/3/18 3:34 PM, Pete Wright wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>> On 07/03/2018 15:29, John Baldwin wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>> That seems like kgdb is looking at the wrong CPU. Can >>>> you use >>>> >>>>>>>>> 'info threads' and look for threads not stopped in >>>> 'sched_switch' >>>> >>>>>>>>> and get their backtraces? You could also just do >> 'thread >>>> apply >>>> >>>>>>>>> all bt' and put that file at a URL if that is easiest. >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> sure thing John - here's a gist of "thread apply all bt" >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> https://gist.github.com/gem-pete/d8d7ab220dc8781f0827f965f09d43ed >>>> <https://gist.github.com/gem-pete/d8d7ab220dc8781f0827f965f09d43ed >>> >>>> >>>>>>> That doesn't look right at all. Are you sure the kernel >>>> matches the >>>> >>>>>>> vmcore? Also, which kgdb version are you using? >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> yea i agree that doesn't look right at all. here is my >> setup: >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> $ which kgdb >>>> >>>>>> /usr/bin/kgdb >>>> >>>>>> $ kgdb >>>> >>>>>> GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] >>>> >>>>>> $ ls -lh /var/crash/vmcore.1 >>>> >>>>>> -rw------- 1 root wheel 1.6G Jul 3 15:03 >>>> /var/crash/vmcore.1 >>>> >>>>>> $ ls -l /usr/lib/debug/boot/kernel/kernel.debug >>>> >>>>>> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 87840496 Jul 3 13:54 >>>> >>>>>> /usr/lib/debug/boot/kernel/kernel.debug >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> and i invoke kgdb like so: >>>> >>>>>> $ sudo kgdb /usr/lib/debug/boot/kernel/kernel.debug >>>> /var/crash/vmcore.1 >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> here's a gist of my full gdb session: >>>> >>>>>> http://termbin.com/krsn >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> dunno - maybe i have a bad core dump? regardless, more >> than >>>> happy to >>>> >>>>>> help so let me know if i should try anything else or >> patches >>>> etc.. >>>> >>>>> Can you try installing gdb from ports and using >>>> /usr/local/bin/kgdb? >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> that seems to have done the trick, at least the output looks >> more >>>> >>>> encouraging. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --- trap 0, rip = 0, rsp = 0, rbp = 0 --- >>>> >>>> KDB: enter: panic >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> __curthread () at ./machine/pcpu.h:231 >>>> >>>> 231 __asm("movq %%gs:%1,%0" : "=r" (td) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> here's my full kgdb session: >>>> >>>> http://termbin.com/qa4f >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> i don't see any threads not in "sched_switch" though :( >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>> >>>> >>> The problem may be that the patch to enable atomic inlining >> of all >>>> >>> macros forgot to set the SMP keyword which means SMP is not >>>> defined at >>>> >>> all for KLD's so all non-kernel atomic usage is with MPLOCKED >>>> empty! >>>> > Problem is that out-of-tree modules build does not have opt*.h >> files >>>> > from the kernel. UP config is a valid one, flipping some >> option's >>>> > default value does not solve the problem. >>>> >>>> Yes, but using the lock prefix in a generic module is ok (it will >> still >>>> work, just not quite as fast) whereas the lack of lock is fatal on >>>> SMP. I would amend Hans' patch slightly to honor the opt_* setting >>>> for KLD_TIED (but that is only true if KLD_TIED means "built as >> part of >>>> a kernel build, so has valid opt_foo.h headers" and not >>>> 'a standalone module where someone put MODULES_TIED=1 on the >> command >>>> line >>>> to make'). >>>> >>>> >>>> I agree with this default. It's sensible to default to (a) the most >>>> popular thing and (b) thing that always works, especially when (a) and >>>> (b) are identical. >>>> >>>> Don't make me start the "Do we really need an SMP option, why not make >>>> it always on" thread :) The number of relevant uniprocessor x86 boxes >>>> that benefit from omitting SMP is so small as to be irrelevant, IMHO. >> A >>>> MP kernel runs just fine on them... >>>> >>>> Warner >>> >>> Where are we on this? >>> It is important to get it fixed, it's already been 4 days, which means 4 >>> days of all modern FreeBSD desktop systems being broken, and possibly >>> other systems with kernel modules from ports as well. >>> >>> >>> Another question, how hard would it be to expose how the kernel was >>> built to modules built from ports, so that they can figure out stuff >>> like SMP and others, that might affect the module build? >> Point the KERNBUILDDIR variable to the directory of the kernel build. >> This is the directory where *.o and opt*.h are located. Then everything >> would just work. >> > > Is the solution that we require everyone to build a kernel before they can > build the standalone modules or am I missing something here? > Hi, Here is a temporary fix: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/336025 Like Konstantin says this issue needs to be revisited. --HPSReceived on Fri Jul 06 2018 - 08:16:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:16 UTC