On 2018-Jun-5, at 5:09 AM, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert_at_cschubert.com> wrote: > In message <1731A84F-4278-43F5-B498-C3501081E783_at_yahoo.com>, Mark > Millard write > s: >>> From ci.freebsd.org for a -r334626 + builds: >> >> --- brk_test.full --- >> cc -target aarch64-unknown-freebsd12.0 --sysroot=/usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch >> 64/tmp -B/usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/tmp/usr/bin -O2 -pipe -g -std=iso9899 >> :1999 -fstack-protector-strong -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k >> -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-empty-body -Wno-string-plus-int -W >> no-unused-const-variable -Wno-tautological-compare -Wno-unused-value -Wno-par >> entheses-equality -Wno-unused-function -Wno-enum-conversion -Wno-unused-local >> -typedef -Wno-address-of-packed-member -Wno-switch -Wno-switch-enum -Wno-knr- >> promoted-parameter -Qunused-arguments -o brk_test.full brk_test.o -lprivat >> eatf-c >> /usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/tmp/usr/bin/ld: error: undefined symbol: brk >>>>> referenced by brk_test.c:52 (/usr/src/lib/libc/tests/sys/brk_test.c:52) >>>>> brk_test.o:(atfu_brk_basic_body) >> >> /usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/tmp/usr/bin/ld: error: undefined symbol: sbrk >>>>> referenced by brk_test.c:55 (/usr/src/lib/libc/tests/sys/brk_test.c:55) >>>>> brk_test.o:(atfu_brk_basic_body) >> >> . . . (and many more) . . . > > Do a clean build or remove the libc directory from /usr/obj, then do > your build. You missed the first line "From ci.freebsd.org . . .": It was not my build, it was a ci.freebsd.org build of FreeBSD-head-aarch64-build . It was specifically #7944 (of -r334628 ) and later. The latest #7951 (of -r334651 ) is still broken the same way. #7943 (of -r334625 ) was the last good build. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)Received on Tue Jun 05 2018 - 10:35:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:16 UTC