Am Sat, 17 Mar 2018 12:44:18 -0700 Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd_at_yahoo.com> schrieb: Tried on the APU: [...] last pid: 17910; load averages: 0.26, 0.16, 0.10 up 6+20:51:54 22:28:48 49 processes: 2 running, 46 sleeping, 1 waiting CPU: 0.5% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 0.0% interrupt, 99.1% idle Mem: 27M Active, 3772K Inact, 98M Laundry, 186M Wired, 32K Buf, 661M Free Swap: 7808M Total, 4204K Used, 7804M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES SWAP STATE C TIME CPU COMMAND 17615 root 1 22 0 13204K 0K 4064K pause 1 0:00 0.00% -csh (<csh>) 17002 root 1 20 0 12104K 0K 3108K wait 3 0:00 0.00% login [pam] (<login>) 975 root 1 20 0 14548K 1260K 88K nanslp 3 0:00 0.00% /usr/local/sbin/smartd -c /usr/local/etc/smartd.conf -p /var/run/smartd.pid 989 root 1 20 0 32264K 8160K 28K nanslp 2 0:21 0.00% ddclient - sleeping for 1149 seconds (perl) 11 root 4 155 ki31 0K 64K 0K CPU0 0 652.1H 396.04% [idle] 997 asterisk 59 52 0 133M 62684K 0K select 0 297:57 2.68% /usr/local/sbin/asterisk -n -F -U asterisk 0 root 26 -16 - 0K 416K 0K swapin 0 60:12 0.56% [kernel] 12 root 14 -52 - 0K 224K 0K WAIT 0 20:39 0.40% [intr] 17618 root 1 20 0 13044K 3472K 0K CPU3 3 0:34 0.12% top -CawSoswap 579 root 1 20 0 15252K 3116K 0K select 0 37:16 0.05% /usr/sbin/ppp -quiet -ddial -unit0 o2vdsl2 19 root 1 -16 - 0K 16K 0K - 1 3:06 0.03% [rand_harvestq] 21 root 3 -16 - 0K 48K 0K psleep 3 1:21 0.02% [pagedaemon] 933 root 1 20 0 10892K 1688K 0K select 2 1:46 0.02% /usr/sbin/powerd [...] Sorry for the messy output ... > On 2018-Mar-17, at 11:26 AM, Andriy Gapon <avg at FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > On 17/03/2018 18:51, Mark Millard wrote: > >> I'll note that top was a -w that reports: > >> > >> -w Display approximate swap usage for each process. > > > > As far as I can tell, this option is quite broken. > > The "approximate swap usage" it reports is nowhere like it. > > Too bad. Do you know if it is so messed up that the > apparent order of "uses more" vs. "uses less" would be > wrong when the difference in reported figures is fairly > large? (I'd avoid assuming an order for sufficiently > small differences [which still might be fairly large].) > > Do you know if the system-wide figures from the summary > line: > > Swap: 61G Total, 61G Free > (could also display an in-use figure) > > are also broken as far as in-use would go? Should > top just be avoided for most swap-in-use information? > > More overall, if anyone knows of such: Is there a > place to get reasonable swap-in-use information, > per process and/or system-wide? > > One thing I've wished for is what would be a low bound > on the overall maximum-in-use figure (system wide), say > by checking periodically a reasonable in-use figure and > keeping track of (and reporting) the maximum-observed-so-far > figure. This kind of background information could be > used in choosing/adjusting a couple of poudriere-devel > parameters that control how much parallel activity > there can be. > > (My local top implementation has an adjustment to also > display such a system-wide maximum-observed-swap-used > figure.) > > === > Mark Millard > marklmi at yahoo.com > ( dsl-only.net went > away in early 2018-Mar) > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" -- O. Hartmann Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder Übermittlung meiner Daten für Werbezwecke oder für die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (§ 28 Abs. 4 BDSG).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:15 UTC