On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Daniel Eischen <deischen_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > On Fri, 18 May 2018, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Steve Kargl < >> sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: >> >>> >>> Check the Makefiles >>> >>> % more /usr/ports/graphics/drm-next-kmod/Makefile >>> >>> ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= amd64 >>> ONLY_FOR_ARCHS_REASON= the new KMS components are only supported on >>> amd64 >>> >>> Not to ia32 friendly. >>> >>> >> So do people use i386 for desktop? And need the latest KMS stuff? >> > > I can easily imagine an embedded x86 kiosk type appliance. Does > basic xorg stuff work without drm? They'd be running current on such boxes? I'm asking if we have any known users. The crux of the problem is that it's hard to get any graphics support from Intel. What little support we get from them is amd64 only. And what little resources we have do support graphics is 64-bit only. There's nobody doing the work for i386, and we're not able to snag it from upstream either. So it boils down to the question of allowing old, obsolete hardware, which nobody's sure works anyway, to get in the way of moving forward to more modern hardware? I'm trying to find value from supporting i386, and a community willing to do that work and I'm not seeing much of either. WarnerReceived on Fri May 18 2018 - 18:24:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:16 UTC