On Mon, 21 May 2018 10:07:28 -0700 Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > Why? "If it isn't broken, why fix it?" > > The conflict affects x86_64-*-freebsd aka amd64. The > conflict does not affect any other architecture. The > Makefile infrastructure can use MACHINE_ARCH to exclude > drm2 from build of amd64. > > I don't use netgraph or any of the if_*.ko modules. > Can we put all of that into ports? I don't use any > scsi controllers, so those can go too. Why make it > insanely fun for users to configure a FreeBSD system. > I just ask. Or why not include drm-next to base svn repo and add some option to make.conf to swith drm2/dem-next ?Received on Mon May 21 2018 - 20:15:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:16 UTC