On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 04:16:32PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Quoting Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw_at_zxy.spb.ru> (from Tue, 22 May 2018 > 15:29:24 +0300): > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 08:17:00AM -0400, Steve Wills wrote: > > > >> I may be seeing similar issues. Have you tried leaving top -SHa running > >> and seeing what threads are using CPU when it hangs? I did and saw pid > >> 17 [zfskern{txg_thread_enter}] using lots of CPU but no disk activity > >> happening. Do you see similar? > > I will try and report back. > > > Can you try https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7538 and report? > > The patch tells it is against -STABLE, we're talking -current here. ZFS don't changes this. > It has been a while since I tried Karl's patch the last time, and I > stopped because it didn't apply to -current anymore at some point. > Will what is provided right now in the patch work on -current? I am mean yes, after s/vm_cnt.v_free_count/vm_free_count()/g I am don't know how to have two distinct patch (for stable and current) in one review. > As a data point, the system I talk about in the start of the thread > has 64 GB RAM and the ARC is not limited via sysctl. Currently vanlia ARC poorly limited via sysctl. After abd extra. May be interesting test ./sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/abd.c:boolean_t zfs_abd_scatter_enabled = B_FALSE; (no sysctl for change this exist)Received on Tue May 22 2018 - 12:40:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:16 UTC