On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 03:47:39PM +0100, Sylvain GALLIANO wrote: > Le jeu. 15 nov. 2018 à 23:10, Mark Johnston <markj_at_freebsd.org> a écrit : > > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 05:05:03PM +0100, Sylvain GALLIANO wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I replaced > > > << printf("XXX knote %p already in tailq status:%x kq_count:%d [%p %p] > > > > > %u\n",kn,kn->kn_status,kq->kq_count,kn->kn_tqe.tqe_next,kn->kn_tqe.tqe_prev,__LINE__); > > > by > > > >> panic("XXX knote %p already in tailq status:%x kq_count:%d [%p %p] > > > > > %u\n",kn,kn->kn_status,kq->kq_count,kn->kn_tqe.tqe_next,kn->kn_tqe.tqe_prev,__LINE__); > > > > > > Here is the stack during panic: > > > panic: XXX knote 0xfffff801e1c6ddc0 already in tailq status:1 kq_count:2 > > > [0 0xfffff8000957a978] 2671 > > > > > Could you please give the following patch a try? > > > > If possible, could you also ktrace one of the active syslog-ng processes > > for some time, perhaps 15 seconds, and share the kdump? I have been > > trying to reproduce the problem without any luck. > > > Unfortunately patched kernel is not stable: > - some processes run at 100% CPU (STOP state) and cannot be killed > - sometime the system completely freeze (need a hard reboot) > > I cannot reproduce the issue as soon as syslog-ng is under ktrace (even > after 10GB of ktrace file) > When I stop ktrace, issue come back after few minutes. That's ok, I'd like to see part of the ktrace even if the problem doesn't occur; this bug appears to be a race condition, so it's not surprising that ktrace might hide it.Received on Fri Nov 16 2018 - 14:42:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:19 UTC