Re: 10G performance regression / difference cxl and ix RELENG11 vs HEAD

From: Navdeep Parhar <nparhar_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 09:53:08 -0700

On 10/12/18 9:52 AM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> The number of retries (the "Retr" column) should have been 0 in a

retransmits, not retries.

Received on Fri Oct 12 2018 - 14:53:12 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mike Tancsa: "Re: 10G performance regression / difference cxl and ix RELENG11 vs HEAD"
Previous message: Navdeep Parhar: "Re: 10G performance regression / difference cxl and ix RELENG11 vs HEAD"
In reply to: Navdeep Parhar: "Re: 10G performance regression / difference cxl and ix RELENG11 vs HEAD"
Next in thread: Mike Tancsa: "Re: 10G performance regression / difference cxl and ix RELENG11 vs HEAD"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:18 UTC