Re: which way to update export_args structure?

On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Brooks Davis wrote:

> 
> This is the direction I'd been thinking.  FWIW, the usecase is more that
> once you've moved away from the struct it's easy to make incremental
> changes then to use a 32-bit mountd on a 64-bit kernel.  Moving toward
> size-independent interfaces helps both causes though.
> 
> -- Brooks
> Email had 1 attachment:
> + signature.asc
>   1k (application/pgp-signature)


Brooks,

What is the benefit or usecase for running a 32 bit mountd on a 64 bit kernel?

-- 

Thanks,

Josh Paetzel