Re: A new stable/12 poudriere jail is inferior to its stable/12 host

-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 02:14:16PM +0100, Graham Perrin wrote:
> > On 21/10/2018 13:31, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 09:41:46AM +0100, Graham Perrin wrote:
> > >> With the host already at r339438,
> > >> creation of a jail (method: svn (other methods failed)) resulted in
> > >> inferior version r339435.
> > >>
> > >> Is this normal?
> > >>
> > >> Re: <https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2018-October/071742.html> I want the version of the jail to match the version of the host before I use poudriere to build kernel modules, and so on.
> > >>
> > >> ....
> > > r339438 is a revision in stable/11.  ?
> > 
> > That's weird, because I recently successfully ran:
> > 
> > svn switch '^/stable/12' /usr/src
> > 
> > ? prior to a successful update of the system.
> 
> Sure.  On my laptop (for example), I have a local private SVN mirror
> repo.  It is currently at r339530.
> 
> On each of 3 different slices, I have stable/11, stable/12, and
> head; the corresponding working directories (which have been updated
> since the repo was last updated) are currently at r339446, r339435,
> and r339530 (respectively).
> 
> FreeBSD's newvers.sh would put "r339530M" in the uname string for
> each of those.
> 
> My version places "r339446M/339530", "r339435M/339530", and
> "r339530M/339530" (respectively) in the uname string to try to help
> clarify which revision in each branch last affected that branch.

Yes please!
-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes_at_freebsd.org