Re: 12-BETA1 contains warning about non-PNP ISA device

From: Warner Losh <imp_at_bsdimp.com> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:48:47 -0600 · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:19 UTC

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:46 AM Warner Losh <imp_at_bsdimp.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:26 AM Rebecca Cran <rebecca_at_bluestop.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/25/18 10:20 AM, Rebecca Cran wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >     uart0 pnpinfo _HID=AMDI0020 _UID=0 at handle=\_SB_.FUR0
>> >     uart1 pnpinfo _HID=AMDI0020 _UID=1 at handle=\_SB_.FUR1
>> >     uart2 pnpinfo _HID=AMDI0020 _UID=2 at handle=\_SB_.FUR2
>> >     uart3 pnpinfo _HID=AMDI0020 _UID=3 at handle=\_SB_.FUR3
>>
>>
>> Also, in case it's useful - the output of "devinfo -v | grep -i uart":
>>
>>
>>      uart0 pnpinfo _HID=AMDI0020 _UID=0 at handle=\_SB_.FUR0
>>      unknown pnpinfo _HID=UTK0001A _UID=0 at handle=\_SB_.FUR0.UART
>> (disabled)
>>      uart1 pnpinfo _HID=AMDI0020 _UID=1 at handle=\_SB_.FUR1
>>      unknown pnpinfo _HID=UTK0001B _UID=1 at handle=\_SB_.FUR1.UART
>> (disabled)
>>      uart2 pnpinfo _HID=AMDI0020 _UID=2 at handle=\_SB_.FUR2
>>      uart3 pnpinfo _HID=AMDI0020 _UID=3 at handle=\_SB_.FUR3
>>
>
> Oh! that looks mostly right, though IIRC the higher UIDs might be
> something else. Harmless enough for now, though.
>
> I also think you might be able to test if we can remove a special case
> kludge we have for the AMDI0020 device since it looks like it has STA_ that
> might be sane now. Are you up for that?
>

Oh, wait, no. Other aml dumps show it's still lame :(

Warner