On 30 Oct 2018, at 14:29, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On 30 Oct 2018, at 12:23, Kristof Provost wrote: >> I’m not too familiar with this part of the vnet code, but it looks >> to me like we’ve got more per-vnet variables that was originally >> anticipated, so we may need to just increase the allocated space. > > Can you elfdump -a the two modules and see how big their set_vnet > section sizes are? I see: > > pf.ko: sh_size: 6664 > ipl.ko: sh_size: 2992 > I see exactly the same numbers. > VNET_MODMIN is two pages (8k). So yes, that would exceed the module > space. > Having 6.6k global variable space is a bit excessive? Where does that > come from? multicast used to have a similar problem in the past that > it could not be loaded as a module as it had a massive array there and > we changed it to be malloced and that reduced it to a pointer. > > 0000000000000f38 l O set_vnet 0000000000000428 > vnet_entry_pfr_nulltable That’s a default table. It’s large because it uses MAXPATHLEN for the pfrt_anchor string. > 0000000000000b10 l O set_vnet 00000000000003d0 > vnet_entry_pf_default_rule Default rule. Rules potentially contain names, tag names, interface names, … so it’s a large structure. > 0000000000001370 l O set_vnet 0000000000000690 > vnet_entry_pf_main_anchor Anchors use MAXPATHLEN for the anchor path, so that’s 1024 bytes right away. > 0000000000000000 l O set_vnet 0000000000000120 > vnet_entry_pf_status > pf status. Mostly counters. I’ll see about putting moving those into the heap on my todo list. Best regards, KristofReceived on Tue Oct 30 2018 - 13:03:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:19 UTC