On 9/2/18 6:17 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > -current at r338322 with manually applied r338372 (fix potential data > corruption in iflib) and r338416 (re-compute arc size). > > What worries me a little bit about the validity of this report is the > gdb 8.1.1 error when loading the dump/kernel: > ---snip--- > warning: kld_current_sos: Can't read filename: Unknown error: -1 > > inferior.c:311: internal-error: struct inferior *find_inferior_pid(int): > Assertion `pid != 0' failed. > A problem internal to GDB has been detected, > further debugging may prove unreliable. > Quit this debugging session? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal] > > This is a bug, please report it. For instructions, see: > <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>. > > inferior.c:311: internal-error: struct inferior *find_inferior_pid(int): > Assertion `pid != 0' failed. > A problem internal to GDB has been detected, > further debugging may prove unreliable. > Create a core file of GDB? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal] > Abort trap (core dumped) > ---snip--- > > kernel panic: > ---snip--- > Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: > > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 5; apic id = 13 > fault virtual address = 0x98 > fault code = supervisor read data, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff8068cbf2 > stack pointer = 0x28:0xfffffe0128caa510 > frame pointer = 0x28:0xfffffe0128caa760 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 1658 (isc-worker0003) > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > cpuid = 5 > time = 1535835179 > KDB: stack backtrace: > db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame > 0xfffffe0128caa1c0 > vpanic() at vpanic+0x1a3/frame 0xfffffe0128caa220 > panic() at panic+0x43/frame 0xfffffe0128caa280 > trap_fatal() at trap_fatal+0x35f/frame 0xfffffe0128caa2d0 > trap_pfault() at trap_pfault+0x49/frame 0xfffffe0128caa330 > trap() at trap+0x2ba/frame 0xfffffe0128caa440 > calltrap() at calltrap+0x8/frame 0xfffffe0128caa440 > --- trap 0xc, rip = 0xffffffff8068cbf2, rsp = 0xfffffe0128caa510, rbp = > 0xfffffe0128caa760 --- > ip6_output() at ip6_output+0xf82/frame 0xfffffe0128caa760 > udp6_send() at udp6_send+0x702/frame 0xfffffe0128caa920 > sosend_dgram() at sosend_dgram+0x346/frame 0xfffffe0128caa980 > kern_sendit() at kern_sendit+0x170/frame 0xfffffe0128caaa10 > sendit() at sendit+0x19e/frame 0xfffffe0128caaa60 > sys_sendmsg() at sys_sendmsg+0x61/frame 0xfffffe0128caaac0 > amd64_syscall() at amd64_syscall+0x254/frame 0xfffffe0128caabf0 > fast_syscall_common() at fast_syscall_common+0x101/frame 0xfffffe0128caabf0 > --- syscall (28, FreeBSD ELF64, sys_sendmsg), rip = 0x8015adf0a, rsp = > 0x7fffdf9f7218, rbp = 0x7fffdf9f7250 --- > Uptime: 22h37m4s > Dumping 13174 out of 61352 > MB:..1%..11%..21%..31%..41%..51%..61%..71%..81%..91% > ---snip--- > > I can not reproduce it at will, but it happens often enough (from once a > day to several times after each reboot). > > Can this gdb be trusted? If yes, which frame do you want to see more > detailed? > > Bye, > Alexander. > I think, you have hit this, no? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230950
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:18 UTC